Legal Opinion
Glanz v. Vernick
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 1, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-0748-MAPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAZZONE, District Judge.
In April, 1989, plaintiff’s decedent, Raymond Vadnais, brought this suit against the defendants, alleging discrimination in violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 87 Stat. 394, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794. Specifically, Mr. Vadnais claimed that the defendants refused to perform elective ear surgery on him because he had tested positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), associated with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Mr. Vadnais claimed to have suffered severe pain in his right ear, which pain was prolonged because of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Robertson v. WegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. DarroneSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Charles Moreno, Cross-Appellee v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Johnson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Lopez v. Regents of UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Glanz v. VernickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.