Legal Opinion
Charles Moreno, Cross-Appellee v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1996No. 94-1231, 94-1247PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J., joined by Merritt, Kennedy, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder and Cole, Jj„
RYAN, J. (p. 793), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MARTIN, C.J. (p. 793), and DAUGHTREY, J. (pp. 793-95), delivered separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part, with Chief Judge MARTIN and Judge MOORE also joining in Judge DAUGHTREY’s opinion.
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, prohibits discrimination against certain handicapped individuals “under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance....” Defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) accepts federal funds for its railroad…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- John Doe v. County Of CentreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Gorman v. BartchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Jotham Clement Johnson v. City of SalineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Meagley v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.