Legal Opinion
Geldert v. Boehland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1937No. 31,177PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 274 N.W. 245, 275 N.W. 299. The appeal is from the order denying defendants' motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
The action was brought to recover for the death of Carl Hultin, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful acts of the defendants, the Minneapolis Street Railway Company and its motorman, the defendant Harry Boehland. On October 10, 1932, at about 7:20 in the morning, there was a collision between an Overland automobile driven east on Forty-ninth street north and a streetcar of defendant street railway company, operated…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gohld v. SvendsgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Bartroot v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Carlson v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Haleen v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Geldert v. BoehlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hack v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. RosenbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- True v. OlderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948