Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. Rosenbloom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 1940No. 32,340PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This action is against the sureties of a special adminis-tratrix to recover the amount of a judgment for costs and disbursements in favor of plaintiff and its employe, Boeh-land, against the special administratrix.

Anna Geldert was appointed special administratrix of the estate of one Carl Hultin. Defendants were the sureties on her bond, which was conditioned as required by statute, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-82, for the faithful discharge of all the duties of her trust according to law.

The special administratrix brought an action against Boeh-land and this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hei v. HellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wiesmann v. Town of BrightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Ladd v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Lough v. FlahertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Geldert v. BoehlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API