Gohld v. Svendsgaard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,000 upon a promissory note. The defense is stated in the second paragraph of the opinion. The case was tried before Leary, J., who made findings and ordered judgment for the amount demanded. From an order deny-' ing his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
This action was brought to recover on a promissory note for $1,000 given by defendant to A. B. Crowell and transferred overdue to plaintiff. "We gather from the record the following admitted or established facts: In January, 1912, Crowell and defendant entered into a contract by which it was agreed that defendant should exchange a farm in North Dakota for Crowell’s 65 shares of stock in the Crowell Drug Company of Minneapolis, Minnesota. In February, 1912, Crowell discovered that there were incumbrances on the North Dakota land which were not contemplated by the contract. To adjust this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Chase v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kemerer v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Byram v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Stegal v. Union Bank & Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Beckett v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. KulowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.