Bartroot v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $154.69 with interest. The case was tried before Einehout, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount demanded. Erom an order denying its motion for a trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Plaintiff’s automobile and a street car came into collision at the corner of St. Peter and Exchange streets in St. Paul on the morning of September 2, 1912. The automobile was injured, and this action was brought to recover the expense of repairs made necessary. The complaint alleged that plaintiff was driving the automobile in due and lawful manner, and that the collision was caused by negligence in the operation of the street car. The answer, in addition to a general denial, alleged contributory negligence, which was denied in the reply. The issues were tried by the court without a jury,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Syck v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- National Pole & Treating Co. v. GilkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co. v. Federal Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Haleen v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- George A. Hormel & Co. v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.