Becker v. American Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The question on the appeal is whether the note sued upon for $6,500, dated July 15,1924, payable to appellee, and' signed, “Franz Fiset, Executor Estate of Chas. Wolf, Dec’d,” is a valid and subsisting obligation of said estate. The note is the last of a number of renewal notes executed in renewal and extension of an original note for $6,500, dated April 10, 1914, all signed by Fiset in like manner to the one in suit. The will of Charles Wolf appointed Franz Fiset, Her-mann Becker, and Charles Kuse joint independent executors, and they qualified immediately after the will was probated. Kuse…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Armstrong v. O'BrienTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Blanton v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Anderson v. StockdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Johnson v. BowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jackson v. TemplinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DuvalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- W. C. Biggers & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Woodruff v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Dondero v. TurrillasNevada Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.