Legal Opinion

Becker v. American Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1926No. 6995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The question on the appeal is whether the note sued upon for $6,500, dated July 15,1924, payable to appellee, and' signed, “Franz Fiset, Executor Estate of Chas. Wolf, Dec’d,” is a valid and subsisting obligation of said estate. The note is the last of a number of renewal notes executed in renewal and extension of an original note for $6,500, dated April 10, 1914, all signed by Fiset in like manner to the one in suit. The will of Charles Wolf appointed Franz Fiset, Her-mann Becker, and Charles Kuse joint independent executors, and they qualified immediately after the will was probated. Kuse…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Armstrong v. O'BrienTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Blanton v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Anderson v. StockdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Johnson v. BowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TemplinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DuvalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. W. C. Biggers & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Woodruff v. CampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Dondero v. TurrillasNevada Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API