Legal Opinion
Kessler v. Loftus
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided November 12, 1997No. 2:96-cv-00241PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
In this attorney malpractice action, Defendants William R. Loftus and William R. Loftus, P.C. (“Loftus”), move to dismiss Count III of Plaintiffs Revised Amended Complaint, which alleges a violation of Vermont’s Consumer Fraud Act, Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 9, ch. 63 (1993 and Supp.1997) (“CFA”). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion to dismiss (paper 28) is granted. 1
I. Factual Background
The following facts are taken to be true, for purposes of this motion. Attorney Loftus represented Deborah Kessler during and following her divorce from Dr.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Roger Rodrigue & Tealla Rodrigue v. Vincent IlluzziSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Beyers v. RichmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Repucci v. Lake Champagne Campground, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Bridge v. Corning Life Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.