Legal Opinion
Bridge v. Corning Life Sciences, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 13, 1998No. 2:96-CV-8PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Colin Bridge has brought suit on behalf of himself and his deceased wife Marie Forest Bridge (“Bridge”), alleging, inter alia, a violation of Vermont’s Consumer Fraud Act, Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 9, § 2453 (1993) (“CFA”) for the misinterpretation of her Pap smear. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B). In a Report and Recommendation filed November 4,1997, the Magistrate Judge recommended that summary judgment on this count be denied. Defendant Coming Life Sciences, Inc. (“Coming”) filed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bisson v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Poulin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Peabody v. P.J.'s Auto Village, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- State v. Custom PoolsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Otis-Wisher v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Webb v. LeclairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007