Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Permutit Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 17, 1942No. 1251PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Findings of Fact
1'. This is a suit brought under the provisions of Section 4915, Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, upon the refusal of the Commissioner of Patents to grant a patent to the plaintiff, Lee G. Daniels, on claims constituting the issue of Interference No. 70,285, entitled Lee G. Daniels v. Thomas B. Clark.
2. Plaintiff Lee G. Daniels is the owner of an application for United States Letters Patent on a valve, filed August 31, 1931, bearing Serial No. 560,303.
3. Defendant the Permutit Company is the assignee of United States Letters Patent No. 2,111,169,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Strong-Scott Mfg. Co. v. WellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Powerlock Floors, Inc. v. Robbins Flooring Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Riche v. Permutit Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- Paper Container Mfg. Co. v. Dixie Cup Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Hansen v. ColliverDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959