Legal Opinion

Riche v. Permutit Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 7, 1942No. 1255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This is an action brought under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain an adjudication of priority of invention and a decree authorizing the Commissioner of Patents to issue letters patent to plaintiff upon his application Serial No. 708,589 filed on January 27, 1934. The corporate defendant is the assignee of Patent No. 1,931,-968, covering the invention in issue. The latter Patent issued on October 24, 1933, to defendants Sweeney and Clark upon application filed by them on March 3, 1930. In the Patent Office interference proceedings, defendants relied upon the filing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  3. Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Harper v. ZimmermannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
  5. Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated v. Hughes Aircraft Company, and General Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
  3. The General Tire & Rubber Company v. Jefferson Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Riche v. Permutit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API