In Re Charles B.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge
¶ 1 The State filed a petition alleging that the Juvenile had committed aggravated as sault with a dangerous instrument in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) sections 13-1204(A)(2), (B); 13-1203(A)(2), 13-604.01, 13-701, 13-702, and 13-801. The Juvenile’s attorney filed a motion to determine the Juvenile’s competency. It is undisputed that the Juvenile is a normal eleven-year-old boy and that the only question was whether, because of his youth, he could understand the delinquency process and aid in his own defense.
¶ 2 The judge found…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. LaraArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Reymundo F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- In Re Eddie O.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re Hyrum H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In Re Reymundo F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008