Legal Opinion

In Re Charles B.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 19, 1998No. 1 CA-JV 98-0138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge

¶ 1 The State filed a petition alleging that the Juvenile had committed aggravated as sault with a dangerous instrument in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) sections 13-1204(A)(2), (B); 13-1203(A)(2), 13-604.01, 13-701, 13-702, and 13-801. The Juvenile’s attorney filed a motion to determine the Juvenile’s competency. It is undisputed that the Juvenile is a normal eleven-year-old boy and that the only question was whether, because of his youth, he could understand the delinquency process and aid in his own defense.

¶ 2 The judge found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LaraArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Reymundo F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. In Re Eddie O.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. In Re Hyrum H.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. In Re Reymundo F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API