Legal Opinion

State v. Lara

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 4, 1994No. 2 CA-CR 92-0901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRUKE, Chief Judge.

Appellant Miguel Angel Lara appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault, which the jury determined to be of a dangerous nature. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, State v. Atwood, 171 Ariz. 576, 832 P.2d 593 (1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1058, 122 L.Ed.2d 364 (1993), we reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On April 9, 1990, appellant was staying with a man named Fernando Bartlett. Around noon, the police received a call from Bartlett complaining of an unwanted person at his house. Tucson police officer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. MelendezArizona Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LaraArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re Charles B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API