Legal Opinion

State v. Lara

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1995No. CR-94-0225-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

Miguel Lara was convicted of aggravated assault. The court of appeals reversed, concluding that Lara was entitled to a “voluntary act” instruction and a lesser included offense instruction on disorderly conduct. State v. Lara, 179 Ariz. 578, 880 P.2d 1124 (App.1994). Disagreeing with these conclusions, and believing that the “voluntary act” instruction raised an issue of importance, we granted review.

PART I

After having been stalked and assaulted by Lara, A1 Bartlett called the Tucson police and complained that Lara would not leave his house. Tucson police officer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. AngleArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. OppenheimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. EarbyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API