In Re Eddie O.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 The key question in this ease is whether the legislature’s provision of 240 days to restore competency in a juvenile proceeding should include time periods when the juvenile does not in good faith participate in the restoration process. Because we hold that the legislative scheme contemplates the juvenile will participate in good faith in the restorative process, we remand to the juvenile court to determine whether that was the case here. If there are time periods in which the juvenile has not so participated, they are to be excluded from the 240-day calculation.
I
¶ 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- In re J.F.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Faith P. v. Dcs, L.E.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHARLES MORRISDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020