Legal Opinion

In Re Tri-County Materials, Inc.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 13, 1990No. 90-1041PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is an appeal and cross-appeal of the bankruptcy court’s decision that while Appellant KMB, Inc. did not have a valid security interest in funds owing to the Debtor, KMB did have a valid mechanics lien on those funds. For the reasons stated below, the bankruptcy court is affirmed.

FACTS

Tri-County Materials, the Debtor below, operated a sand and gravel pit. Ladd Construction Company was. a general contractor which had a contract with the State of Illinois to construct a portion of Interstate 39. Ladd and Tri-County entered into a contract…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Koenig v. McCARTHY CONSTR. CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  2. McMillan v. Joseph P. Casey Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Alexander Lumber Co. v. Farmer CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Standard Lumber Company v. Chamber Frames, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
  5. D. D. Kennedy, Inc. v. Lake Petersburg Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Concrete Equipment Co. v. Fox (In Re Vigil Bros. Construction)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Klein Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. Tempglass Southern, Inc. (In Re Tempglass Southern, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API