In Re Tri-County Materials, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MIHM, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is an appeal and cross-appeal of the bankruptcy court’s decision that while Appellant KMB, Inc. did not have a valid security interest in funds owing to the Debtor, KMB did have a valid mechanics lien on those funds. For the reasons stated below, the bankruptcy court is affirmed.
FACTS
Tri-County Materials, the Debtor below, operated a sand and gravel pit. Ladd Construction Company was. a general contractor which had a contract with the State of Illinois to construct a portion of Interstate 39. Ladd and Tri-County entered into a contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Koenig v. McCARTHY CONSTR. CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
- McMillan v. Joseph P. Casey Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Alexander Lumber Co. v. Farmer CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Standard Lumber Company v. Chamber Frames, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
- D. D. Kennedy, Inc. v. Lake Petersburg Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Concrete Equipment Co. v. Fox (In Re Vigil Bros. Construction)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Klein Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. Tempglass Southern, Inc. (In Re Tempglass Southern, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1992