Legal Opinion

People v. Mazurette

California Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2001No. S081661PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Following denial of her motion to suppress incriminating evidence, defendant Mary Lucia Mazurette pleaded no contest to violating Health and Safety Code section 11377, possession of methamphetamine. Entry of judgment was deferred pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 1000 et seq., and she entered a drug diversion program. We granted review to decide whether sections 1000-1000.4 preclude defendant from immediately appealing the trial court’s decision denying her suppression motion. As explained below, we conclude the Court of Appeal correctly dismissed defendant’s appeal.

Facts

Offi…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Teal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. TotariCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. Hernandez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API