People v. Willis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court validly exercised its authority in sentencing defendant Brandon Dionte Willis for a “wobbler” offense. Defendant appeals from the court’s judgment that extended his probation beyond three years from the beginning of his original summary probation period. He contends that in an earlier proceeding, the trial court classified his conviction as a misdemeanor, which limits probation to three years. Respondent argues that defendant’s conviction was not classified as a misdemeanor, but remained a felony, which would allow the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Coffey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. GLEECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Kaufman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Garcia CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017