Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1997No. 96-16870PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
124 F.3d 1019
7 A.D. Cases 323, 25 A.D.D. 136, 10
NDLR P 279,
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6891,
97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,143
John ARMSTRONG; John Amauric; Richard Ponciano; Jack
Swensen; Billy Beck; Judy Fendt; Walter Fratus;
Roy Zattiero, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
United States of America, Intervenor,
v.
Pete WILSON; Joseph Sandoval; James Gomez, Director,
Department of Correction; Kyle S. McKinsey; Kevin Carruth;
David Tristan; Marisela Montes, Deputy Director of the
Parole and Community Services Division, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 96-16870.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Thompson v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.