Legal Opinion

Litton v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1905PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court. — Hon. Houston W. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

Action on the statute to recover double the value of two mules hilled by a locomotive of the defendant company. The complaint, among other things, avers as follows:

*142“That said mules came upon the track of said railroad and were killed in said township at a point Avhere said railroad passes through and along inclosed and cultivated fields and uninclosed lands and where defendant was required by law to erect and maintain lawful fences on the side of its said road with openings and gates therein, and where there was not any crossing of said road by a public highway and not within the limits of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mellor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Chouquette v. Southern Electric RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Ridenhour v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Salmon Falls Bank v. LeyserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Owens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Hales v. RainesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Hensler v. StixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Rundelman v. John O'Brien Boiler Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Carson v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API