Legal Opinion
Bruneau v. Seabrook
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 24, 2004No. AC 24400PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
In this personal injury action, the defendants, Stanley Seabrook, Jr., and Mihaiy Sea-brook, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Heather Bruneau. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) admitted into evidence a certain letter pursuant to General Statutes § 52-174 (b) and (2) denied their motion for remittitur with respect to the jury’s award of noneconomic damages. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record discloses the following relevant facts and procedural history. On March…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lopiano v. LopianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Carmel Hollow Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Ham v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Barry v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Milliun v. New Milford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Johnson v. PikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- DeMaria v. BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.