Boliver v. Monnat
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The motion is for judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute *661a cause of action. The action is to recover damages for the breach of an express or implied warranty that alcoholic liquor sold by the defendant to the plaintiff was fit for immediate human consumption as a beverage.
The plaintiff alleges that between the 29th day of May, 1926, and the 31st day of May, 1926, in a store and saloon of which the defendant was proprietor, located in the hamlet of Indian River, county of Lewis and State of New York, in which the de endant kept for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. . OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Adler v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cohen v. Dugan Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Boliver v. MonnatNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- Handler v. Peter Doelger Brewing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1940