Legal Opinion

Handler v. Peter Doelger Brewing Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Plaintiff challenges the legal sufficiency of the affirmative defense contained in the answer herein, under subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The complaint alleges, among other matters, an agreement between the parties whereby defendant employed plaintiff to render certain services in obtaining new customers for defendant’s product, and retaining old ones; that as a result of said services at least 25,000 half barrels of beer were sold; that plaintiff was wrongfully discharged; and that there is due him under the agreement a balance of $18,443.75. The answer consists…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Johnston v. . DahlgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Griffith v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Adler v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Handler v. Peter Doelger Brewing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Low v. Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API