Legal Opinion
Ziruk v. Bedard
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 13, 1997No. AC 15713PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant Richard A. Bedard1 appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the *138judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, following a default against Bedard for failure to plead.
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. By complaint dated June 2, 1994, the plaintiff instituted the underlying action against the defendants seeking monetary damages for false representations allegedly made by the defendants in connection with the sale of certain investment securities. On July 6, 1994, the defendant Bedard, who appeared pro se, filed a motion to dismiss.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Batory v. BajorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Connecticut National Bank v. OxenhandlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Gardner v. PilatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Handy v. Minwax Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Nastro v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Federal Insurance v. GabrieleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Handy v. Minwax Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.