Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Pilato

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 15, 1997No. 15408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The sole question on appeal is whether a trial court, on its own motion, has the power to open a judgment of dismissal more than four months after the judgment was rendered when it is clear that the judgment was originally rendered because of an administrative mistake and a timely motion to open had previously been made and denied. The defendants appeal from the opening of such a judgment, claiming the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to open the judgment.

In the usual case, a trial court loses personal jurisdiction to act in any way with reference to that case four months after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Infante v. PorathConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Ziruk v. BedardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. East Haven Builders Supply, Inc. v. FantonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Gardner v. PilatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Gardner v. PilatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API