Legal Opinion

Rose v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 1934No. 6380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Suit upon a war risk insurance policy. The main issue was whether the insured, James Milford Rose, became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the policy. The parties by written stipulation waived trial by jury and consented that the court might make “separate findings of fact and conclusions of law * *

The court found that the premiums on the policy were paid up only to the date of the insured’s discharge from the army, and that at the time of his discharge, ho was not suffering total disability within the meaning of the policy, and dismissed the ease. Plaintiff appealed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Oyler v. Cleveland, C. C. & ST. L. RY. CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
  3. Thomas E. Basham Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roach v. MinshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Cecil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  3. Gott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. CradyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  5. Snowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API