Legal Opinion
Oyler v. Cleveland, C. C. & ST. L. RY. CO.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1926No. 4607PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
In this case the question is whether the railroad rightfully made the special tariff charge, to collect which this suit was brought. There was a trial by the court without a jury, pursuant to R. S. § 649 (C. S. § 1587), and a judgment for plaintiff; defendant duly settled a bill of exceptions, which “contains all the evidence,” and seeks review. There were no special findings.
In a review of the practice under this statute, we have held (City of Cleveland v. Walsh Co., 279 F. 57, 61) that the question whether there was any evidence to support a judgment for the plaintiff may be so presented by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- General Motors Co. v. Swan Carburetor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Wynne v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Brown v. Harvey Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.