Roach v. Minshall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
It appearing to the court upon a consideration of this case that a jury was waived and' the cause tried to the court, that there was only a general finding and judgment in favor of appellees, that there was no request for any special findings of fact, and of course no exception for a failure to find specific facts, that there was no proposition of law presented to the court by motion for judgment with request for a ruling thereon, and that there is therefore no reviewable question presented in the record [see Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 356, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Wynne v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Preferred Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940