Legal Opinion

Roach v. Minshall

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1936No. 6746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

It appearing to the court upon a consideration of this case that a jury was waived and' the cause tried to the court, that there was only a general finding and judgment in favor of appellees, that there was no request for any special findings of fact, and of course no exception for a failure to find specific facts, that there was no proposition of law presented to the court by motion for judgment with request for a ruling thereon, and that there is therefore no reviewable question presented in the record [see Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 356, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Wynne v. FriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Preferred Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API