Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Suit to recover a payment of income tax, involving the question whether the taxpayer was a personal service corporation entitled to the benefits of sections 231 and 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918. 40 Stat. 1076> 1058.. After a jury had been waived in writing, and the ease tried without any request for special findings, the District Judge filed an opinion discussing the facts and the law, and directing a judgment for defendant. The defendant) then made a motion “for a separation of the law and a special finding of facts,” and the court inserted in the judgment entry this: “The court further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Humphreys v. Third Nat. Bank of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Dayton Bronze Bearing Co. v. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Wholesale Grocers, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiffs v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- May v. MarburyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Hutcheson v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1982
- State Bank of New York v. Henderson County, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.