Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Garfield county: James N. Paul, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtEoot, J.
Action under chapter 107, laws 1905, being sections 10606 and 10607, Ann. St. 1907. Judgment was rendered in>favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
This case has been elaborately briefed and exhaustively argued by counsel for the respective litigants, and by friends of the court, but more attention has been given to the validity of the statute than to the facts in the instant case. The act is as follows: “Section 10606. It is hereby declared and made the duty of each corporation, individual, or association of individuals, operating any railroad as a public carrier of freight in the state…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Adams v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1919
- Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- Smith v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Marshall v. BushNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.