Legal Opinion

Kline v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 84-0185Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court for disposition is a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). The motion was filed on behalf of defendant Harry V. Pfautz, D.O., a private physician who allegedly rendered medical treatment to plaintiff Mark T. Kline between February 8 and 15, 1982. For the reasons discussed hereinafter, the motion is denied.

II. Background

Plaintiffs are a husband and wife whose complaint, filed on February 7, 1984, names four defendants whom plaintiffs contend administered or were responsible for the administering…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Ayala v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API