Legal Opinion

Ayala v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1977No. 76-1899PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

The State of California, 28 individuals, and 45 insurance companies appeal from the district court’s dismissal of claims against appellee Pullman, Inc. for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Background and Proceedings Below

This is a joint appeal in 11 of over 100 actions consolidated for pretrial purposes in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL No. 207. All of these actions for recovery of damages arise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Karen Jean Hymer v. Benjamin K. Chal and Victoria Leilani ChaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. Of America v. William GuytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Snow v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API