G. W. Mart & Son v. City of Grinnell
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
This appeal is prosecuted with the hope and purpose of testing the validity of a certain ordinance passed by the city council of the defendant city of Grinnell. The ordinance is entitled: “An ordinance to regulate . . and license circuses, menageries, theaters, tlie- . . .. n .,. .. _ . n .,. .. _ atncal exhibitions, shows, merry-go-rounds, swings, wheels, moving-picture theaters, and other exhibitions, entertainments and devices, and providing a penalty for violations thereof. ’’
The petition prays for a writ of injunction, both temporary and permanent, that the defendants “be enjoined and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Cascaden v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Bear v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Sawyer v. LorenzenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Ewing v. Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wood Bros. Thresher v. EicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Massey v. City Council of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Kent Products, Inc. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.