Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kent Products, Inc. v. Hoegh

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1953No. 48392PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

— Prior to July 4, 1953, sale of colored oleomargarine in Iowa was prohibited by statute. Sections 190.6, 191.2, subsection 3, Code, 1950. Chapter 97, Acts of the Fifty-fifth General Assembly, effective on said date, permits the sale of colored oleomargarine (we will call it “margarine”) upon compliance with certain specified conditions. This requirement Of section 3, chapter 97, is the subject of this controversy: “There shall be four readily legible imprints made by the manufacturer of the word ‘oleo’ on tbe product equally distributed on one of the greater sides of each one-quarter pound,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Watson v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Curtis 1000, Inc. v. YoungbladeDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Nichols v. City of EvansdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Lever Brothers Company v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Lewis Investments, Inc. v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. State Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lutheran Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API