Styers v. Winston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant’s first assignment of error is to the denial of its motion for judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiff’s action is based on allegations of negligence, and this assignment of error presents the question whether sufficient evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant was offered to carry the case to the jury.
It is well settled law in North Carolina that proof of injury caused by the explosion of a bottle containing a carbonated beverage, standing alone, is not sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the ground of actionable negligence. The principle of res ipsa…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Evangelio v. Metropolitan Bottling Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Ferrell v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jenkins v. Harvey C. Hines CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Prince v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.