Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Harvey C. Hines Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 24, 1965No. 359PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of its motion, at the conclusion of all the evidence, for judgment of involuntary non-suit.

In Styers v. Bottling Co., 239 N.C. 504, 80 S.E. 2d 253, Parker, J., based on decisions cited, summarizes the legal principles pertinent to decision on this appeal as follows:

“It is well settled law in North Carolina that proof of injury caused by the explosion of a bottle containing a carbonated beverage, standing alone, is not sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the ground of actionable negligence. The principle of res ipsa loquitur is not applicable.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Dail v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Robertson Ex Rel. Robertson v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API