Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against Marcus & Tepper

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1982No. 80-259-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; complaint dismissed.

This is an appeal by the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (hereinafter Board)1 from an order of the referee dismissing the complaints of professional misconduct filed against respondents Jack L. Marcus and Jerome A. Tepper (hereinafter respondents).2 The *562referee found that certain advertisements published on behalf of respondents did not create an overall impression that was false, misleading or deceptive and that the Board did not establish that any of the specific statements in the advertisements were false, misleading or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. In Re RMJSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KalalWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KalalWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against Marcus & TepperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API