In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Kalal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. This attorney disciplinary matter involves an attorney's misrepresentation of fact during oral argument to this court, in violation of SCR 20:3.3,1 which imposes upon attorneys the obligation of candor toward the tribunal. We emphasize at the outset that an attorney's duty of candor toward the tribunal is central to the truth-seeking function of any court, including, obviously, this one. Oral argument is not an opportunity for deception. This court makes its decisions, albeit tentatively, immediately following oral argument, relying in part on information supplied by *263counsel in response…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against SosnayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SmytheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PangmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- LOCAL 2489, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. Rock CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GaminoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against AliaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against TheobaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.