Legal Opinion
Matter of Disciplinary Proc. Against Marcus & Tepper
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1982No. 80-259-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
107 Wis.2d 560 (1982)
320 N.W.2d 806
IN the MATTER OF the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST Jack L. MARCUS & Jerome A. TEPPER, Attorneys at Law.
No. 80-259-D.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Argued April 27, 1982.
Decided June 2, 1982.
For the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility there were briefs and oral argument by Robert H. Bichler, of Racine.
For Jack Marcus there was a brief by David A. Saichek, Theodore B. Hertel, Jr., and Saichek & Hertel, S.C., of Milwaukee, and oral argument by David A. Saichek.
For Jerome Tepper there was a brief by Robert E. Sutton and oral argument by Walter F.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.