Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Turner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1974No. B-4232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Civil Appeals has held that the stated policy limits of the uninsured motorist coverage provided by a single mul-ti-car policy are to be “stacked” or “pyramided” where necessary to pay damages *688the named insured is entitled to recover from an uninsured motorist as a result of a collision while the insured was driving or occupying one of the vehicles covered by the policy. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Turner, Tex.Civ.App., 498 S.W.2d 8. This is contrary to our recent decision in Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Tucker, Tex.Sup., 512 S.W.2d 679, there being no material…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Upshaw v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Agricultural Workers Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. BatyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API