Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Turner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1973No. 16099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Justice.

A law question not so far decided by the Texas Supreme Court is whether “stacking” of uninsured motorist insurance is appropriate in a case of multiple automobiles covered by a single policy. In a recent case, the 14th Court of Civil Appeals (at Houston), acting upon reasoning of American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Ranzau, 481 S.W.2d 793 (Tex.Sup.1972), determined “stacking” to be proper. Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Tucker, 494 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.Civ.App., opinion dated April 18, 1973). We hold “stacking” to be proper under the facts of this case.

Appellee’s single policy of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Liberty Insurance Company v. RanzauTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. ZellarsTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. GatlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Edward W. MoleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nelson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dhane v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API