Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Tucker
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice.
These two cases present one common question: Are the stated policy limits of the uninsured motorist coverage provided by a single multicar policy containing the provisions discussed below to be “stacked” or “pyramided” where necessary to pay damages the named insured or a “relative” is entitled to recover from an uninsured motorist as the result of a collision while the plaintiff was driving or occupying one of the vehicles covered by the policy? In one of the cases the 14th Court of Civil Appeals at Houston concluded that the question should be answered in the affirmative.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. KiddTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Unigard Security Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Newton v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- John T. Stephens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.