Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The dispositive issue here is whether the defendants’ counterclaim constitutes a separable and unrelated cause of action whose disposition may result in a judgment. 1 We answer in the negative, dismiss the appeal, and hold that the trial court’s denial of summary judgment on the counterclaim did not determine an entire cause of action. This is so because the terminated counterclaim is plainly and inextricably interrelated with the unresolved claims being pressed by the plaintiffs. 2 No judgment can be rendered in this case until all of the parties’ claims will have been decided.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Reams v. Tulsa Cable Television, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Fleet v. Sanguine, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.