Mee v. Bankers' Life Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, as administratrix of Harry Mee, from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after the direction of a verdict for defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action upon two certificates of membership in defendant life insurance association upon the assessment or co-operative plan, issued simultaneously in April, 1892, to one Edward W. Mee; the beneficiary therein named being a brother, Harry Mee. The former died April 2, 1894, and the latter died intestate soon after the institution of this action, whereupon the administratrix of his estate was substituted as plaintiff. At the trial the court below ordered a verdict .in favor of defendant, and on appeal from an order *212denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial the principal assignments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Murray v. Home Benefit Life Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Metropolitan Safety Fund Accident Ass'n v. WindoverIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Rice v. New England Mutual Aid SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Seavey Ex Rel. Ellis v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Modern Woodmen of America v. ColmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Engstrom v. FARMERS & BANKERS LIFE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Taylor v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.