State v. Spenst
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*757WARREN, J.
Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 487.540. He moved to suppress certain statements he made, evidence of observations by the arresting officer and the results of sobriety tests performed by defendant on the ground that the officer’s stop of defendant and subsequent inquiry were unlawful. The trial court granted the motion. The state appeals, and we reverse and remand.
The trial court incorporated by reference in its order, a letter opinion that stated, in part:
“The motion to suppress will be allowed.
“I find the following relevant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. WalpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.