Legal Opinion
State v. Hanna
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 26, 1981No. 10-79-11427, CA 19220PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The state appeals a trial court order allowing defendant’s motion to suppress. The issue is: Did a police officer "stop” defendant within the meaning of ORS 131.615, 1 and, if so, did the officer have reasonable suspicion to believe defendant had committed a crime to justify making such stop? 2
Defendant was indicted for burglary of a pharmacy. The essential facts are as follows: At 4:20 a.m. on November 10, 1979, an alarm alerted the police to a burglary in progress. Officer Avalos, who was at the scene within minutes, apprehended one suspect and saw what he believed was another male coming…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WalpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. ButkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.