Legal Opinion

State v. Walp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 30, 1983No. M3-28; CA A27763PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. She assigns as error the denial of her motion to suppress. She relies on ORS 131.615 and the state and federal Constitutions. We determine that defendant was unlawfully stopped within the meaning of ORS 131.615 and reverse.

Shortly after midnight, two deputy sheriffs responded to a complaint about a party in a subdivision south of Bend. When the officers arrived, they saw a Volkswagen leave the area. The officers completed their investigation and, as they prepared to leave, the Volkswagen returned to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. McChesney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API