Legal Opinion
Samsung Electronics Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 11, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-39; Court 13-00099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”), moves for judgment on the agency record contesting defendant United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination in Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 77 Fed.Reg. 75,975 (Dec. 26, 2012) (“Final Determination ”). Commerce and defendant-intervenor Whirlpool Corporation, oppose Samsung’s motion. For the following reasons, Samsung’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In January 2012, Commerce…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cathedral Candle Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Inland Steel Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- TMK IPSCO v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Canadian Solar, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Samsung Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Canadian Solar, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.