Clary Insurance Agency v. Doyle
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
This case involves an insurance agency’s failure to obtain workers’ compensation insurance, and a later failure to notify the prospective insured of its error. In addition to ordering the insurance agency to assume the position of insurer for a loss suffered by the proposed insured during a time when it was not covered, the trial court, based on the jury’s verdict, entered a punitive damage award of $190,000. The appellants raise objections concerning the applicable standard of care, the need for expert testimony, an instruction on negligent misrepresentation, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Meier v. Ross General HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Haskins v. SheldenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.