Legal Opinion

Clary Insurance Agency v. Doyle

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1980No. 4386PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This case involves an insurance agency’s failure to obtain workers’ compensation insurance, and a later failure to notify the prospective insured of its error. In addition to ordering the insurance agency to assume the position of insurer for a loss suffered by the proposed insured during a time when it was not covered, the trial court, based on the jury’s verdict, entered a punitive damage award of $190,000. The appellants raise objections concerning the applicable standard of care, the need for expert testimony, an instruction on negligent misrepresentation, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Meier v. Ross General HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Haskins v. SheldenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API