Johnson, MacDonald & Associates v. Webster Plastics
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING WEBSTER PLASTICS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant Webster Plastics’ Motion for Partial Sum mary Judgment (Doe. #32). The Motion has been fully briefed and was orally argued on June 23, 1994.
The parties have unanimously consented to plenary magistrate judge authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and the case has been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge at Dayton on that basis (Doc. #49).
The Motion seeks judgment as a matter of law that Ohio Revised Code § 1335.11 is void…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Enquip Technologies Group v. Tycon TechnoglassOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- National Ass'n of Optometrists & Opticians v. LockyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Lett v. Paymentech, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1999
- Cecil v. Duck Head Apparel Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995
- NATIONAL ASS'N OF OPTOMETRISTS & OPTIC. v. LockyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006